- Members: 123,510
- Total Threads: 46,892
- Total Posts: 308,646
- Classified Ads: 1,086
- Club Listings: 323
- Link Listings: 147
- Media Files: 9,740
- User's Rides: 4,328
Year: 1992
Model: Mustang LX
Mods: Heavy
State: GA
Type: Nice Weather
ET Range: Unknown
[Read Specs]
EEC-IV Adaptive Control. Your best friend or your worst nightmare?
Welcome to the wonderful world of EEC electronics! (pronounced "EEK") This is the first in a series of articles here on The Mustang Works dealing with the EEC. We will be discussing various aspects of the EEC in a Mustang. By understanding how the EEC controls the engine, hopefully you'll get a better idea of why some changes to your engine may or may not perform as you expected. Through a series of articles, we will go through major sections of the EEC and how they work with common aftermarke...
[Read More]
Welcome to the wonderful world of EEC electronics! (pronounced "EEK") This is the first in a series of articles here on The Mustang Works dealing with the EEC. We will be discussing various aspects of the EEC in a Mustang. By understanding how the EEC controls the engine, hopefully you'll get a better idea of why some changes to your engine may or may not perform as you expected. Through a series of articles, we will go through major sections of the EEC and how they work with common aftermarke...
[Read More]
|
Which is the most performance restrictive aspect of a stock 87-95 5.0?
|
| The Stock Heads (E7TE's). |
  
|
| Result: 38% |
| The Stock Intake. |
|
|
| Result: 14% |
| Stock cam or someother components (TB, MAF, PCM, etc.). |
|
|
| Result: 2% |
| Both the Stock Heads and Intake suck the same, changing one with out the other is useless to you. |
|
|
| Result: 46% |
|
Register or login to vote on this poll |
